Shopping Scam Risk Score Checker

Select warning signs you can actually see on a shopping site, marketplace listing, social ad, delivery claim, or checkout page. NoBuyCart returns an educational risk estimate, not a verdict, investigation, or guarantee.

What the checker evaluates

The checker looks at eight visible categories: identity consistency, price realism, contact information, policy clarity, payment route, pressure, delivery logic, and after-purchase fee requests. It may help when an unfamiliar store, seller, message, or deal feels hard to judge quickly.

The estimate cannot prove fraud, verify a business, inspect a private account, recover money, or make a link safe to open. Use it as a pause framework, then verify important details through official channels before paying or sharing information.

How to use the checker

  1. 1. Review each warning sign. Read the checkbox labels before choosing anything.
  2. 2. Select only signs actually observed. Do not guess just to make the score higher.
  3. 3. Generate the score. The result adds the selected weights and caps the total at 100.
  4. 4. Read the explanations. The result lists the factors that contributed to the score.
  5. 5. Verify outside the page. Use official retailer, platform, bank, carrier, or agency channels before paying or sharing information.

This note stays in this browser tab. NoBuyCart does not visit, send, or store it.

Scoring methodology

Each selected warning sign adds the points shown below. The tool uses the same weights in the React checker and in these published examples.

Factor Weight What a visitor might observe
Store identity inconsistency 14 The domain spelling, store name, company name, email, or contact page do not line up.
Abnormally low price 14 A product is listed far below established retailers or normal secondhand prices.
Missing contact information 10 The site hides support routes, uses only a form, or gives no business identity.
Weak or unclear policies 10 Return, delivery, refund, or privacy pages are missing, vague, copied, or mention another company.
Risky payment request 18 The seller avoids standard checkout and pushes transfer, gift cards, crypto, QR payment, or a personal link.
Urgency or social pressure 10 A post, ad, message, timer, or seller says you must act immediately.
Delivery mismatch 10 The page promises impossible shipping, mismatched warehouse locations, or vague tracking.
Extra fee or card request 14 A follow-up message asks for customs fees, redelivery fees, refund fees, OTPs, or card details.

Why each factor matters

Store identity inconsistency +14

Why it may deserve checking
Identity gaps make it harder to know who is responsible if payment or delivery fails.
Possible legitimate explanation
A new small business may be updating branding, domains, or support pages.
Verification step
Search the business name independently and compare the domain, contact page, and policy names.

Abnormally low price +14

Why it may deserve checking
Extreme discounts can be used to rush payment before a visitor checks the seller.
Possible legitimate explanation
Clearance, damaged packaging, used condition, or older stock can sometimes explain a low price.
Verification step
Compare several independent sellers and look for a clear reason for the discount.

Missing contact information +10

Why it may deserve checking
Limited contact details make disputes, returns, and delivery questions harder to resolve.
Possible legitimate explanation
Some small shops start with minimal pages, but they should still explain how customers get help.
Verification step
Look for consistent support details through the official site, platform profile, or independent sources.

Weak or unclear policies +10

Why it may deserve checking
Policy gaps can leave a buyer with no clear process after payment.
Possible legitimate explanation
A real shop may have outdated policy text, especially during a redesign.
Verification step
Read the refund and shipping terms before checkout and compare names, dates, and contact routes.

Risky payment request +18

Why it may deserve checking
Some payment routes provide fewer records or buyer protections when a problem appears.
Possible legitimate explanation
Certain legitimate sellers may prefer a method for fees or local convenience.
Verification step
Check the platform rules and understand dispute options before sending money.

Urgency or social pressure +10

Why it may deserve checking
Pressure reduces the time available to compare identity, price, policies, and payment safety.
Possible legitimate explanation
Real sales and limited stock exist, but they should not prevent basic verification.
Verification step
Leave the page, search the seller independently, and return only after the pressure is lower.

Delivery mismatch +10

Why it may deserve checking
Delivery inconsistencies may signal that the order path is not connected to a reliable fulfilment process.
Possible legitimate explanation
International delivery, dropshipping, or carrier delays can create confusing timelines.
Verification step
Check the stated carrier or seller platform directly rather than relying on a surprise link.

Extra fee or card request +14

Why it may deserve checking
Follow-up payment requests can turn a suspicious purchase into a second exposure of money or details.
Possible legitimate explanation
Some real orders can involve duties or carrier updates, but those should be verified independently.
Verification step
Use the retailer, carrier, platform, or bank route you open yourself before paying anything else.

Risk levels

Low observed risk

0-29

Few listed warning signs were selected.

Does not mean: It does not mean the store, seller, message, or checkout is verified.

Next: Continue normal checks: confirm identity, policies, price, payment route, and delivery details.

Medium observed risk

30-59

Several visible warning signs are present and deserve outside verification.

Does not mean: It does not prove fraud or rule out a legitimate explanation.

Next: Pause before paying, compare independent sources, and use official support or platform channels.

High observed risk

60-100

The selected warning signs form a stronger visible-risk pattern.

Does not mean: It is still an educational estimate, not an investigation or final determination.

Next: Avoid payment or new information sharing until identity, payment, delivery, and support routes are verified.

Worked fictional examples

Fictional example

discount electronics store

58/100 · Medium

A visitor sees a new electronics shop advertising a current camera bundle at 80% off. The store name in the footer does not match the domain, the contact page is thin, the refund page is vague, and a timer says the price expires in minutes.

Options selected

  • Store identity inconsistency (+14)
  • Abnormally low price (+14)
  • Missing contact information (+10)
  • Weak or unclear policies (+10)
  • Urgency or social pressure (+10)

Appropriate verification

Compare the camera price with established retailers, search the business name independently, read the refund and delivery terms, and avoid entering payment details until the seller identity is clearer.

The score does not prove the store is fake. It shows that price, identity, contact, policy, and pressure signs are stacking together.

Fictional example

marketplace seller requesting off-platform transfer

52/100 · Medium

A marketplace seller lists a popular game console below normal used prices. The profile has little history, the seller says other buyers are waiting, and they ask to move payment to a direct transfer outside the platform.

Options selected

  • Abnormally low price (+14)
  • Missing contact information (+10)
  • Risky payment request (+18)
  • Urgency or social pressure (+10)

Appropriate verification

Keep communication on the platform, compare similar listings, check platform payment rules, and do not send a deposit through an unsupported transfer route.

The score reflects the payment and pressure pattern. A new seller can be legitimate, but the off-platform payment request needs stronger verification.

Fictional example

delivery message requesting a small card payment

66/100 · High

A text claims a parcel is waiting and asks for a small redelivery fee. The sender name does not match the expected carrier, the link domain looks unfamiliar, and the page asks for card details immediately.

Options selected

  • Store identity inconsistency (+14)
  • Risky payment request (+18)
  • Urgency or social pressure (+10)
  • Delivery mismatch (+10)
  • Extra fee or card request (+14)

Appropriate verification

Open the retailer or carrier site manually, compare the tracking number from the original order, and avoid card entry from the surprise message link.

The score is a warning-sign estimate. It is not a technical scan of the link and it does not contact any carrier.

False positives and limitations

Legitimate businesses can trigger warning signs. A new small business may have limited public history. A real clearance sale may explain a low price. A minimal website may be unfinished rather than malicious. A seller may prefer a payment method for ordinary local reasons. Those possibilities do not erase the warning signs; they mean the next step should be verification, not an instant accusation.

What to do after receiving a result

  • Verify the domain and business identity independently.
  • Use the retailer, platform, carrier, or bank contact method you open yourself.
  • Avoid unexpected payment links, off-platform transfer pressure, gift cards, crypto, and surprise card requests.
  • Read refund, privacy, and delivery policies before paying.
  • Preserve screenshots, transaction records, messages, URLs, and order details if money has already been sent.

Sources for this checker